Meet The Lawyer Who Is Defending Suspected Billionaire Kidnapper, Evans - Lawyer Olukoya Ogungbeje

Follow NaijaDays on Twitter Follow @naijadays

Points of interest of the Nigerian legal advisor who is protecting charged extremely rich person criminal, Chukwudumeme Onwuamadike otherwise known as Evans has been uncovered. Exactly when Nigerians thought no legal counselor will venture out to protect famous very rich person criminal, Chukwudumeme Onwuamadike a.k.a. Evans, Voice Olukoya Ogungbeje has demonstrated a special case. Ogungbeje who heads Lawflex Chambers and is the Chairman of Voice Vanguard, ventured out Wednesday. 

He got the features as he recorded a central rights suit for the benefit of Evans, by dragging the Inspector General of Police, and three others under the steady gaze of a Federal High Court in Lagos over Evans asserted unlawful confinement . 

Joined as respondents are the Nigeria Police Force, Commissioner of Police Lagos State, and the Special Anti-Robbery Squad, Lagos State Police Command. In his central rights the admitted criminal is looking for a court arrange guiding the respondents to promptly charge him to court if there is any body of evidence against him. He is in the option, looking for a request, convincing the respondents to promptly discharge him genuinely without any offense justifying a charged. 

In the suit checked, FHC/L/CS/1012/2017, Evans is fighting that his proceeded with detainment by the respondents since June 10, without a charge, or discharge on safeguard is an encroachment on his major rights. 

He contended that the respondents should have charged him to court as per the arrangements of Sections 35 and 36 of the Constitution. It was further contended that the claimed offense conferred by the candidate (Evans) are correspondingly interlaced with the protected defends as given under Sections 35 and 36 of the Constitution. 

In a 27-section sworn statement in help of the movement ousted to by Evan's dad, Stephen Onwuamadike, it was affirmed that the candidate has been subjected to media trial with no court's request by the respondents. 

Onwuamadike encourage affirmed that the media trial and news arranged by the respondents have kept on producing responses in both print and electronic media without his child being managed reasonable hearing under the steady gaze of a courtroom. 

The deponent additionally asserted that since his child's capture, all his relatives have been denied access to him while media specialists have been allowed free access to him. The new suit has not been doled out to any judge and no date has been settled for the hearing. Evans legal counselor, who distinguished himself on Facebook as Voice Olukoya Ogungbeje had been included in disputable cases lately. 

In April, he recorded a suit asking the Federal High Court to stay procedures on the relinquishment of $43,449,947 (about N13billion), N23,218,000 and £27,800 (about N10.6 million) found in a level in Ikoyi, Lagos. 

He likewise looked for a request coordinating the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to outfit the court with a report of its preparatory or last examination on the wellspring of the cash, its proprietor, and how the monetary standards got into the building. 

Ogungbeje, in a movement on see requested that the court not arrange a lasting relinquishment of the cash since there are cases and counter cases as to its proprietorship by the Rivers State government and the National Intelligence Agency (NIA)and since the Federal Government had set up the Osinbajo board to discover reality about the responsibility for cash. 

"This good court has the inborn ward under Section 6 (6)(b) of the Constitution to arrange and coordinate exhaustive examination on the wellsprings of the monies, their proprietors, the proprietors of the Osborne Towers where the monies were found and how they got into the building. 

The case did not go anyplace as the cash was later for all time relinquished to the Federal Government. Ogungbeje likewise once documented a suit in Lagos in 2014 requesting the reestablishment of Murtala Nyako as legislative leader of Adamawa state. This was after Nyako was arraigned by the state get together in July of that year and the speaker of the state gathering had assumed control. Ogungbeje asserted the Assembly's affirmed inability to serve Nyako actually with the denunciation see damaged his basic appropriate to reasonable hearing as revered under Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution. 

After the court heard contentions from gatherings and judgment date settled, Fintiri, through his legal advisor, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) encouraged the judge not to convey the decision. The previous Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) president supplicated the court to set aside every one of the procedures led in the suit so far on the grounds that his customers were not presented with the suit as per the law. 

As per him, the court should strike out the whole activity since the due procedure of law was not taken after. Olanipekun, who is additionally speaking to Mammadi and the House of Assembly, contended that the starting procedures were not appropriately served on his customers.